Showing posts with label Dieting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dieting. Show all posts

Book Review: Fat Politics by J. Eric Oliver

Fat Politics: The Real Story behind America's Obesity EpidemicIf you want to fire people up, try talking about fat. Not spicy enough for you? Throw in some commentary about politics, money, society, exercise, diet and health. Now you've got the perfect recipe for controversy. We're talking about Fat Politics by J. Eric Oliver. You're either going to love this book or hate it with a passion. But either way, it's sure to stir up some strong opinions.

Oliver questions the existence of an obesity epidemic and whether fat itself should be labeled as a dangerous disease. If read with an open mind, his research certainly gives you something to think about (whether or not you end up fully agreeing with him).

"Consider, for example, what an obesity epidemic means for the following groups. For scientists researching issues of weight, an obesity epidemic inflates their stature and allows them to get more research grants. For government health agencies, it is a powerful rationale for increasing their programs and budget allocations. For weight-loss companies and surgeons, it is a way to get their services covered by Medicare and health insurance providers. And, for pharmaceutical companies it can justify the release of new drugs, and help inflate their stock prices. The very same people who have proclaimed that obesity is a major health problem also stand the most to gain from it being classified as a disease. For America's public health establishment, an obesity epidemic is worth billions."

In chapter two, Oliver explains How Obesity Became an Epidemic Disease. He demonstrates how politics and the media skewed our ideas about fat and health, and why labeling obesity as a disease actually holds us back from finding real solutions for lasting health.


The Link Between Metabolic Health and Disease

Oliver rightly points to overall metabolic action as the cause not only of obesity but also degenerative disease. He questions the idea that weight itself is the cause behind our more troubling health problems, and suggests that perhaps there is a bigger picture.

"And it is these other metabolic changes that are behind many of the diseases that are typically associated with being too fat. The reason that diabetes and some types of cancer are on the rise is not because Americans weight too much, it is because their metabolisms are out of whack. Fatness may result from metabolic processes that are behind these ailments, but it is the underlying metabolic processes, and not the weight, that cause us so much trouble."

Why We Hate Fat People

Have you ever thought about it? Why our society harbors such resentment and malice toward heavier people? We are afraid of fat. This has to do with numerous factors, according the Oliver, including our modern standards of beauty and propaganda from the medical community. But wherever it's coming from, the fear of fat is very real.

"For instance, more that a quarter of college students believe that becoming fat is the worst thing that could happen to a person."

Really? That sure says a lot about our priorities in life. Oliver suggests getting some perspective about fat in his chapter about genetics and obesity:

"Fatness is not a disease or a bodily dysfunction; it is a protective mechanism that evolved to survive fluctuations in our food supply. Judging someone's health by how much they weigh is like judging a camel by how much water it has in its hump--in conditions of privation, our extra weight, just like water, may be exactly what we need to survive. Our weight is merely an expression of this adaptive mechanism at work."

What We Eat and What We Weigh

Oliver challenges many beliefs about diet and weight. He's read the work of Gary Taubes (awesome, right?) but doesn't fall into the trap of blaming any particular macronutrient for our weight and health problems. His stance is that carbs are no more to blame than fat. Instead Oliver speculates that there are a number of dietary factors that could be contributing to obesity and disease. After all, a lot has changed in the last 40 years when it comes to what (and how) we eat. Oliver discusses everything from crop subsidies to the invention of the microwave, but in the end concludes that it's most likely the combination of all these things--rather than just one of them--that impacts our weight the most.


Being Thin Versus Being Healthy

This is always one of my favorite topics. In our pursuit of being thin, many of us have sacrificed our health. According to Oliver, it is the American way.

"Although most Americans value bodily fitness as a marker of social prestige, they value thinness more. And for good reason--in a culture in which obesity is so demonized, being fit yet heavy does little to remove the stigma of a large body size, particularly for women. For instance, if a woman is incredibly fit but still bulky or heavy, she is still likely to face size discrimination. The emphasis on female fitness is primarily concerned with being thin not necessarily being healthy. Because of our cultural obsession with thinness, any discussion of exercise inevitably becomes connected to issues of weight while concerns of health fly out the window."

I mean, think about it: how many people do you know that joined a gym to get healthy? Yeah, right. Most people exercise to achieve a particular physical appearance, not to achieve better health. Which is too bad, because research shows that exercise has a far more substantial impact on our health that it does on our waistlines.


But Are There Any Solutions?

My biggest beef with Oliver's book is that you aren't left with a solid idea of what we should be doing, perhaps because Oliver believes that his research doesn't point to there being a particular solution.

"In truth, the only way we are going to 'solve' the problem of obesity is to stop making fatness a scapegoat for all our ills. The means that public health officials and doctors need to stop making weight a barometer of health and issuing so many alarmist claims about the obesity epidemic. This also means that the rest of us need to stop judging others and ourselves by our size."

I personally couldn't agree more. There's far too much hate and melodrama surrounding our weight. But considering we're in a society that puts so much focus on being thin, at the end of the book you're sort of left standing with your hands up in the air thinking, "Well, what the heck am I supposed to do now?"

The answer: simply allow yourself to focus on more important things than weight. Whether or not you are at the weight you would like to be cannot be a determining factor in your happiness. If it is, then it's guaranteed you'll be miserable. Regard health as part of the bigger picture and not just in terms of your dress size. Live to be healthy and enjoy life, rather than living to be thin.

Buy Fat Politics by J. Eric Oliver today.





-----------------------------------
Follow Me on Pinterest

Making Peace With Food



Most of us are at war with food. This is because we have made food out to be the enemy. We may single out specific foods (like bread) or aim for a broader approach by engaging in battle with entire macronutrients (like carbs). And a large majority of people, in one form or another, have openly declared war on one innocent little energy unit: the calorie.

Our war appears to be founded on principle. After all, we must redeem our health (or at least our waistlines). But as part of the bigger picture, this approach of demonizing and moralizing food only leads one thing: a severely impaired relationship with food and with our bodies.

Funny thing is that the moment we start this war against food, we are setting ourselves up to fail. We are biologically and psychologically driven to failure in this regard. The book Intuitive Eating by Evelyn Tribole and Elyse Resch discusses this in depth:

"When you rigidly limit the amount of food you are allowed to eat, it usually sets you up to crave larger quantities of that very food."
"[F]ood deprivation sets off a biological drive. Psychological forces wreak havoc with your peace of mind, triggering cravings, obsessive thoughts, and even compulsive behaviors. If you are someone who has also experienced deprivation in areas outside of food, such as love, attention, material wants, etc., the deprivation connected to dieting may be felt even more intensely for you."
"The mere perception that food might become banned can trigger overeating. Just thinking about going on a diet can create a sense of panic and send you on a trail of eating every food you think won't be allowed."

"The threat of deprivation becomes so powerful that all reason is lost and you find yourself eating whatever is to be forbidden, even if you are not hungry."

How many of you indulged more during the holidays knowing that your New Year's resolution diet was just around the corner? Did you eat more of that pumpkin pie knowing you'd be cutting out carbs come the first of January?

The solution to this war is to make peace with food. But what does this mean?

"Making peace with food means allowing all foods into your eating world, so that a choice for chocolate becomes emotionally equal to the choice for a peach."

When we subscribe to nutritional dogma, we assign emotional and moral values to our food. This makes it impossible to make choices about the food we eat without triggering an emotional roller coaster.

How many times have you said (or heard someone say) these words: "I can't eat that. I'm on a diet and I'm trying to be good." Did you hear that? We actually label ourselves as good or bad based on what we eat! Talk about making food an emotionally charged issue.

Eating is not a matter of good versus evil. It is simply listening to our bodies, identifying a need and then filling that need as best we can. This is the foundation of intuitive eating. It's simple, but it's not always easy. After all, most of us are coming to the table with a lot of hang ups about food.

I cannot stress enough that your relationship with food is a process. You truly can (and should) take this one step at a time. You have to practice intuitive eating. You don't just wake up one morning, start eating intuitively and suddenly have a balanced relationship with food. Just take baby steps. Start with one meal, or even just one food.

  • Simply acknowledging that you assign too much emotional value to your eating habits might be the first step in repairing your relationship with food.

It doesn't come easy and it certainly doesn't happen overnight. But in the long run, it makes all the difference. To quote again from Intuitive Eating:

"Ironically, the process of giving yourself permission to eat is actually the stepping-stone to rebuilding your trust with food and with yourself. In the beginning, each positive food experience is like a tiny thread. They may be few and far between, and seem insignificant, but eventually the threads form a strand. The strands multiply into strong ropes and finally the ropes become the bridge to a foundation of trust in food and in yourself."

This post is part of Real Food Wednesday and Fight Back Friday.




-----------------------------------
Follow Me on Pinterest

Dangers of Dieting: Why You Shouldn't Diet in 2011


Did you know that nearly 40 percent of all New Year's resolutions are related to weight? So if you made a resolution to lose weight this year, you're certainly not alone. In fact, there's about 45 million people jumping on the diet bandwagon with you (along with their shiny new eating plan and exercise routine). You've made this resolution every year for decades. But of course this year is different. This year it's actually going to work.

Never mind that 95 percent of folks who go on a diet don't maintain their loss in the long-term (and nearly half of them gain back more than they lost). That doesn't matter, because most of us are convinced that somehow we'll be part of the 5 percent that succeeds in keeping off the weight after a restrictive diet. Every year we come back to the same resolution because we think we can finally beat those odds. It's almost as sad as watching someone invest their life's savings in a slot machine.

But the biggest problem isn't that dieting doesn't work. Unfortunately, regaining the weight you lose (and possibly even more) is the least of your concerns. The truth is that most people don't understand the dangers of dieting. The health risks you take when you diet are very real, but it's something health officials like to sweep under the rug while spouting off phrases like "obesity epidemic" and talking about how obesity kills.


The Dangers of Dieting

  • Research shows that weight fluctuations are more dangerous than carrying excess weight. A history of weight cycling via dieting is strongly associated with an increased risk for developing metabolic diseases like diabetes, hypertension and heart disease. This is independent of weight (so it applies whether you're a dieter who is skinny or one who's heavy). This evidence strongly suggests that dieting affects you on more than a body fat level: dieting affects you--and can harm you--on a metabolic level.
  • One study showed that obese women who diet are far more likely to have high blood pressure than obese women who do not have a history of dieting--more evidence that demonstrates the dangers of dieting on the entire metabolism.
    • Weight loss that comes through dieting (especially extreme dieting) always risks losing lean body tissue in addition to fat. This robs your muscles, bones and organs of the material they need to function properly. While some diets increase this risk more than others, it is a risk with all diets that restrict calories.
    • Our eating habits are passed on to our children. Kids pick up on our obsessions about weight and our eating habits. Whether we realize it or not, we often project our own insecurities about our weight and our restrictive eating habits onto our kids. It's hard not to. But research shows that parents who impose restrictive eating habits only encourage further weight gain in their children. Stopping this vicious cycle in its tracks is reason enough to swear off dieting forever, in my opinion.
    • Dieting distorts our natural relationship with hunger and food. When food becomes "good" and "bad," eating becomes a moral issue rather than an issue of nourishment. When we deny our hunger, we forget how to eat for natural reasons and instead develop habits of emotional eating and experience guilt when we eat the "wrong" food. Basically, we forget how to eat. This can result in eating disorders, distorted body image and poor health in long run.

    Suddenly dieting doesn't sound like the path to health and happiness, does it? The dangers of dieting are unfortunately all too real, but millions of people ignore these risks every day.

    The best resolution you can make for 2011 is to stop dieting. It's time to end our unhealthy relationship with food, exercise, and our bodies. There's a better way to improve your health and the way you feel about yourself, and that's something I'll be talking a lot more about this year.

    This post is part of Fight Back Friday.






    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest

    Does Obesity Really Kill?


    The propaganda surrounding the obesity crisis is fueled by one belief: obesity kills. We are so frightened by fat weight because we are continually told that even ten extra pounds can put our life in danger. We are under the impression that fat weight causes disease. This, however, is a big fat myth.

    But wait. Doesn't obesity cause hypertension, heart disease, diabetes and cancer? Doesn't obesity cause hundreds of thousands of deaths each year? The answer is no. Here is some interesting information regarding obesity, death and disease:

    • In 2005, researchers reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association that, despite having spent months analyzing countless records, they failed to show that even severe obesity increases mortality risk.

    • To quote Linda Bacon from Health at Every Size on a study of 1.7 million Norwegians: "In this, the largest epidemiological study ever conducted, the highest life expectancy is among individuals who are overweight by our current standards and the lowest life expectancy is among those defined as underweight. What's more, individuals who fit into what is deemed the ideal weight range had a lower life expectancy than some of those who were obese."

    • Research has demonstrated that obese people who are physically fit have mortality rates as low as people who are lean and fit. In fact, overweight and obese people who are fit will most likely live longer than someone who is lean but unfit.

    • Angiographic studies have shown that obesity has no relationship to the development or progression of heart disease. Some studies have indicated that being overweight or obese may actually decrease your risk of dying from a heart attack or stroke.

    • Some researchers claim there is a link between obesity and cancer. The truth is, most studies fail to find an association between weight and cancer mortality. In fact, for every study you can find that claims an association between obesity and cancer, you can find another one that shows obesity is actually protective against cancer.

    • Although we have been led to believe that obesity is a leading cause of diabetes, research indicates that insulin resistance appears before weight gain. Insulin resistance is causing weight gain and diabetes. Weight gain is not causing insulin resistance and diabetes.

    • Conditions such as hypertension, heart disease and diabetes can all be improved in overweight and obese individuals through dietary and lifestyle habits, regardless of whether weight is lost or not.


    Clearly there are some discrepancies when it comes to the information fed to the masses about obesity and health. The biggest problem with propagating this misinformation is that it places the focus on weight alone rather than on diet and lifestyle habits.

    Consider this: if fat weight was really the cause of health problems and even death, why aren't we all rushing out to get liposuction? Because we all know that's ridiculous! Then why do we think that losing fat will solve all of our health problems? The fact is that it won't.  

    Lifestyle trumps weight. Eat real food that nourishes your body. Be active because it energizes you. Give your body the rest it needs. Be a part of something that gives you joy and fulfillment. If these things lead you to weight loss, that's wonderful. If not, that doesn't mean you haven't greatly improved your health and quality of life in the meantime. The exaggerated focus on weight is an arbitrary distraction, so don't let it distract you from what's really important when it comes to your health and happiness. 

    Further Reading On This Subject:

    Health At Every Size: The Surprising Truth About Your Weight by Linda Bacon

    Rethinking Thin: The New Science of Weight Loss by Gina Kolata

    The Diet Cure by Julia Ross

    Fat Politics: The Real Story behind America's Obesity Epidemic by J. Eric Oliver

    Big Fat Lies: The Truth about Your Weight and Your Health by Glenn A. Gaesser


    This post is part of Real Food Wednesday hosted by Kelly the Kitchen Kop.


    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest

    There is No Obesity Epidemic



    In 1998, more than 30 million people became overweight. And guess what? It happened while they were sleeping.

    That's right. In June of 1998, the number of overweight people in America increased by 50 percent--overnight! How did this happen? Did they all go on a massive potato chip binge? No. In fact, not one of them had gained a pound. Instead, a handful of researchers had decided to decrease the maximum healthy BMI (Body Mass Index) from 27 down to 25.

    And instantly, millions of people were suddenly overweight. Their weight hadn't changed, but the reigning standards had. And suddenly we had an obesity epidemic on our hands.


    Why Do We Call It an Epidemic?

    The term obesity epidemic is in itself confusing. Typically when we speak of an epidemic we're referring to a literal epidemic of infectious disease (like the bubonic plague, for instance). But obesity isn't infectious. At least, I've never heard of anyone "catching" thirty pounds at the office.

    Of course we also use the term epidemic to describe anything that is spreading rapidly through the masses. I might say we're having an epidemic of cell phones, for example, because since 1990 the number of cell phone users has increased by a staggering 37,000 percent! Now that's an epidemic of technology if I ever saw one.

    When the media throws around the term "obesity epidemic," they appear to be attempting to describe a crisis of massive weight gain making its way through our society. This, however, may be an incredibly inaccurate picture of what's really happening with our weight.


    How Much Weight Have We Really Gained?

    We're constantly bombarded by the message that, as a society, we're fatter than ever. For the last several decades, we've been steadily gaining pound after pound and crossing the invisible line into obesity. Or have we?

    In reality, the average weight gained is only a few pounds.

    Fat Politics: The Real Story behind America's Obesity Epidemic"When talking about the rise in our weights, many public health experts like to cite the dramatically increasing number of obese Americans. For instance, between 1980 and 1994, the number of obese Americans increased by 55 percent. While this seems like a large increase in obesity, it does not really reflect the amount of weight most Americans were gaining. Most Americans did not increase their weight by 55 percent; Americans gained, on average, only about seven to nine pounds, depending on their height."

    - from Fat Politics: The Real Story behind America's Obesity Epidemic 


    Where Did the Epidemic Go?

    Would it surprise you to learn the obesity "epidemic" has plateaued? It's true. We aren't becoming more and more obese, packing on endless pounds until every last one of us is clinically obese. Nope. The epidemic has apparently decided to take a break... for the last decade.

    Health At Every Size: The Surprising Truth About Your Weight"No doubt Americans have gained weight over the last few decades. But if we are so concerned about an epidemic, why aren't we celebrating its apparent end? The incidence of obesity is no longer increasing. According to government statistics, obesity rates for women have leveled off and stayed steady since 1999, sufficient time to consider it a plateau. They have also leveled off for men, having been stable since 2003. Same is true for kids: The prevalance of obesity for children and teens is no different today than it was in 1999."
    - from Health at Every Size

    More to Come...

    My intention is not to inarguably disprove the theory of an obesity epidemic, but to inspire questions regarding the accuracy of the information we've been told. Believe it or not, the debate over the presence of an obesity epidemic is just the tip of the iceberg. There are more discrepancies on the topic of weight to sift through, and this is a discussion I plan to continue right here on this blog.

    This post is part of Real Food Wednesday hosted by Kelly the Kitchen Kop and Fight Back Friday hosted by Food Renegade.










    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest

    The Candy Diet




    They're happy. They're fit. And they're running down a beautiful tropical beach where I'd love to be right now. Who wouldn't want to be the couple in the picture above? Who wouldn't want to look like them? The majority of us see someone who is lean, fit and in shape, and we immediately wonder how we can look the same way. More than anything, we wonder: what do they eat that keeps them looking like that?

    The entire diet industry is based on the answer to that question. The basic assumption is that if the xyz diet helps so-and-so become lean, then the xyz diet will help me get lean. The magic happens when you showcase someone who looks lean and fit on the xyz diet. Throw in a few simplistic scientific analogies, a catchy title, and you've got yourself a diet that millions of people will follow because they want to look like so-and-so.

    This is a pretty effective formula. So I've decided to take advantage of it. I've already got my catchy title. And I've got someone to showcase. All I have to do is find a few research studies that appear to confirm my ideas (which shouldn't be that hard to do, diet gurus do it all the time). So here it is:


    The Candy Diet!

    The idea is to eat a boatload of candy, chocolate and baked goods pretty much every day. Don't worry about avoiding high fructose corn syrup, artificial dyes or trans fat. It's all good. Just shovel it down, as much as you like.

    After all, this seems to work just fine for Lamar Odom:



     
     

    I mean, Lamar's in pretty good shape. You can't argue about that. Granted, he does get in a lot of cardio running around the basketball court, but most diet programs include a cardio program so that's no surprise. I mean, this diet is really straightforward: eat tons of candy, work out and you'll be lean like Lamar!

    But you don't believe me. Why not? Because it's just ridiculous, you say. Here is where I'm going to challenge you: why is this idea so ridiculous? I know what you're thinking: well, obviously because nobody can get lean on a candy diet!

    But wait a minute. Not nobody. Lamar does it. And I'll bet you can find someone else who does it too. In fact, a good many of us know that person who eats junk food all day long and looks like the model on the cover of a fitness magazine (often whether they work out or not).

    So why aren't we going around preaching the weight loss rewards of The Candy Diet? Because you know that if you sat down and ate that much candy every day, you wouldn't look anything like Lamar. Maybe some people can do it, but not you. In fact, there's probably quite a few of us who did sit down and eat like Lamar and ended up looking quite the opposite of lean.


    Start Questioning Diets

    Of course, you all know I wouldn't really advocate a candy diet. And I know that you're too smart to fall for that kind of baloney anyway. No, I didn't want you to rush to the local supermarket and load up your cart with candy (if you did that then I hope you kept the receipt!).

    Here's what I want you to do today: question the next diet guru who promises you'll look as lean and fit as they do if you follow their diet plan. Even if their diet makes sense, sounds fairly healthy and they've rattled off a couple scientific studies to prove their point. What makes them lean won't necessarily make you lean. Remember Lamar Odom and The Candy Diet.

    In the coming weeks I'll be exploring this topic even further. Our assessment of diets and weight loss is completely skewed by the diet industry and even the medical community. I believe the truth about these subjects will prove to be quite fascinating (and perhaps even mind-bending!).

    This post is part of Real Food Wednesday hosted by Kelly the Kitchen Kop and Fight Back Friday hosted by Food Renegade.






    



    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest

    Day 21 on RRARF: Deprivation is Dieting

    -photo credit-

    In my last post about RRARF, I talked about giving up sweets. I could tell this topic was met with some resistance and I wanted to elaborate on it a little. As someone with a lifelong sweet tooth, going sweets-free for 30 days is quite an endeavor for me to take on. I may have given the impression that I was going to be exerting some intense willpower and woefully depriving myself of what I craved. But this would definitely be in opposition to my crusade against dieting. Why? Because...

    DEPRIVATION IS DIETING!

    That's exactly what dieting is: depriving yourself of one thing or another. Whether it's calories, fat, carbs, sweets or whatever. And this extends beyond what we eat. We can also deprive ourselves of fresh air, sleep, pure water, sunshine, downtime, self-esteem, healthy relationships, living with purpose, or any number of things. It doesn't matter. In the end, deprivation in any form activates the starvation response in the body. Why? Because deprivation is stressful! Deprivation triggers a mental and emotional cascade that ultimately leads to a strong physiological response.

    RRARF by definition is the opposite of deprivation. Instead of depriving yourself, you aim give your body all the support it needs through Rehabilitative Rest and Aggressive Re-Feeding. Deprivation is not on the menu.

    So then how is cutting out all sweets for 30 days not deprivation? Well, maybe it is and maybe it isn't. Everyone is different. And everyone's metabolic state is different. For some people, giving up sugar is like giving up a limb. There's no doubt in my mind that two years ago, going without sweets would have been extreme deprivation for me. I would have given in to cookies-and-cream ice cream within 36 hours and probably would have felt like a complete failure. But today, I'm finding (with some degree of surprise) that it's no big deal.

    These 30 days of RRARF are an experiment for me, not a testament of my personal virtue. I am no model of willpower and nor do I want to be. My intentions on RRARF are to test my own body's cues and whether or not they change under certain conditions. I want to know how sugar makes me feel and see if it interferes with following my internal cues. For instance, is it easier for me to turn down Halloween candy when my stomach is full of hamburgers and potatoes? My answer: absolutely!

    But guess what? I still wanted some Halloween candy this year. In fact, I had to stop and consider whether or not I really wanted to turn it down at the risk of feeling deprived. After a little pondering I figured that I was more interested in going through with this experiment than munching on some chocolate. Once I made that decision, I didn't feel like this was an act of willpower any more. It wasn't about being "good" on a program or avoiding "bad" foods. It was something I wanted to do for my own personal reasons. Willpower and deprivation are very subjective, as I have come to personally understand.

    So yes, I was able to turn down Halloween candy this year without feeling deprived. That's new to me. But I want to be honest: I don't think I can live without anything sweet in the long-term without feeling some serious deprivation. Milk and fruit certainly have their place in a healthy diet. And so do things like cheesecake and coconut oil fudge.

    The take-home message today is this: don't deprive yourself. Instead, consider your personal wants and needs, as well as your current state of health. Then you can make decisions about what's practical and beneficial for you at this time. What may feel like deprivation to you right now may not feel the same way in a few weeks or a few months. So take the time to re-evaluate your needs now and then as well. That way you get the best results for your health.

    If you want to know more about RRARF, you can  download Matt Stone's RRARF e-book for free and get all the nitty gritty details. And you can also see what Matt has to say concerning the truth about dieting and deprivation in this video presentation.

    Other RRARF Posts:

    Day 1 on RRARF: What is RRARF?
    Day 2 on RRARF: Why I'm Doing It
    Day 3 on RRARF: Rest and Relaxation  
    Day 7 on RRARF: Benefits Already!
    Day 8 on RRARF: Eat the Food!
    Day 9 on RRARF: Adieu, Le Sucre!  
    Day 21 on RRARF: Deprivation is Dieting
    Day 23 on RRARF: Life Without the Scale

    RRARF vs. The Milk Diet


    This post is part of Real Food Wednesday hosted by Kelly the Kitchen Kop.




    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest

    Day 8 on RRARF: Eat the food!



    The message of RRARF is simple: "Eat the food!" But this often inspires questions like, "What food? How much food? When do I eat it?" As human beings, we like to make simple things complicated. That's just our nature. But RRARF really is simple, once you get to know the guidelines.

    First and foremost, you have to eat. Not till you're 80% full. Not on a small square blue plate. Just eat. This isn't permission to binge on ice cream and pizza. But it is permission to eat as much whole food as you can possibly enjoy, without counting calories, carbs, fat grams or any other arbitrary measurement.


    What to Eat

    The basic formula for RRARF meals would be: a generous portion of unrefined starch, an ample serving of protein, plenty of veggies, and enough quality fat to make it all tasty.

    Here's an example of what I had for breakfast this morning:

    2 cups hashbrown potatoes fried in coconut oil
    3 slices of bacon
    2 eggs

    (I'm still having a hard time adding veggies at breakfast. Sometimes I throw a bunch of fresh salsa on everything to add to the veggie content.)

    And the other day, this is what I had for dinner:

    2 cups quinoa with plenty of butter
    4 ounces roast chicken
    1 cup of onions and carrots, sauteed in butter

    The kind of whole, real food we've talked about here at The Nourished Life since the beginning is highly recommended while on RRARF. But there are some important keys for making RRARF work for you as far as food choices go:

    1) Fat should be mostly saturated, with a view toward limiting polyunsaturated fat as much as possible. That means no peanut butter binges. And veggie oils are definitely out. Stick with good old-fashioned dairy fats and tropical fats. Beef fat is also pretty good.

    2) Carbs should be unrefined: yams, potatoes, quinoa, buckwheat, brown rice, whole corn grits, popcorn, etc. If you tolerate gluten then whole-grains like wheat, barely and oats are acceptable, as are beans and legumes if your digestion is good.

    3) Fructose is out. (Read about fructose dangers here.) So are basically sweeteners of any kind, including non-caloric sweeteners like stevia. Why? Because sweetness itself impacts metabolic health, whether actual sugar or calories are involved or not. And while I'm not into bashing fruit, during RRARF it should be limited.

    4) Keep it real. Processed food has no place on RRARF (or anywhere else, for that matter). Keep all refined foods to a minimum as much as possible. Of course, we live in a world where it's close to impossible to completely avoid processing or refinement of some kind, but just do your best.


    How Much to Eat

    I've sworn off calorie counting for RRARF (and hopefully forever), but for those of you who are curious, I believe my meals average somewhere between 800-1,000 calories each. I eat 3-4 times per day, depending on how large my meals are (more food per meal generally means less meals for me).

    RRARF is a refeeding strategy meant to stimulate metabolic functions by providing the body with tons of energy via real food and rest. So we are not--I repeat not--limiting food intake. As Matt says on page 41 of the RRARF e-book:

    "You don’t have to feed yourself to the point of being uncomfortable and gagging, but the calorie, assuming it is accompanied by a great deal of nutrients, is a powerful weapon in the battle to increase metabolic activity."


    When to Eat

    And as for when to eat? That's the simplest of them all: eat when you're hungry. Not every three hours, not every six hours, not at a predetermined lunchtime... every time you're hungry, eat until you're no longer interested in eating another bite. That's it!


    More About RRARF Foods

    I really can't compete with Matt's excellent food list and definition of the appropriate RRARF diet that he lays out in his book. I highly recommend you download the complete RRARF e-book for free and check out his recommendations yourself.

    And if you think I'm nuts for eating a high calorie diet, then you might want to see what Matt has to say concerning the truth about low-calorie diets in this video presentation.


    Other RRARF Posts:

    Day 1 on RRARF: What is RRARF?
    Day 2 on RRARF: Why I'm Doing It
    Day 3 on RRARF: Rest and Relaxation  
    Day 7 on RRARF: Benefits Already!
    Day 8 on RRARF: Eat the Food!
    Day 9 on RRARF: Adieu, Le Sucre!  
    Day 21 on RRARF: Deprivation is Dieting 
    Day 23 on RRARF: Life Without the Scale

    RRARF vs. The Milk Diet







    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest

    Day 2 on RRARF: Why I'm Doing It

    Why does anyone RRARF? Eating real food to your heart's content while indulging in rest and relaxation for 30 days isn't really the conventional road to health... and maybe that's exactly why it works so well to resolve issues with low body temperature, digestion, blood sugar, moods, hypertension, skin, energy and even libido (really!). Anyone concerned with these problems or their general metabolic health is a candidate for RRARF.

    But I want to honest and upfront with my own personal reasons for deciding to follow RRARF for the next 30 days. I've taken on a lot of dietary and lifestyle changes in the last two years that have given my metabolic health a huge boost. These changes have included:

    • eating more saturated fat
    • eating less polyunsaturated fat
    • avoiding processed food for the most part
    • getting more sleep
    • cutting way back on cardio exercise
    • cutting out coffee
    • fitting more downtime into every day
    • learning to handle stress
    • shaving my head

    (Okay, that last one was just to see if you were paying attention. I prefer my hair long, thank you very much!)

    I didn't do any of this overnight. It's been a gradual process, and it's also brought on a lot of metabolic healing. My moods are better, my body temperature is sky high, my digestion is top notch, and I have tons more energy than I used to.

    My reasons for doing RRARF are more subtle, but important to me nonetheless. Like many of you, I have a long history with dieting, religiously weighing myself, and basically developing a pretty poor body image over the years. Getting over this has been something I've been working on since earlier this year. But I'll admit that this is often easier said than done. And while there's been periods where I've been pretty good about ignoring the scales and the calories, I haven't been able swear off them altogether. Over the past couple months I found myself slipping back into daily weigh-ins, counting calories, and (probably not a coincidence) getting back my old sweet tooth.


    So here are my personal goals for RRARF:

    • Learn to listen to my body's cues when it comes to hunger. I'm really good at eating when I'm supposed to, when someone else tells me to or when I just feel like munching. I'm not so good at eating whenever my body asks me to. I plan on learning how to obey my body during the next 30 days. That means I will be completely ignoring calories. No counting, just obeying.
    • Give up the scale. I haven't hopped on the scale for ten days and I don't plan on weighing myself at all during RRARF (or maybe ever again!). I'll talk more about this in an upcoming post.
    • Ditch the sweet tooth. According to Matt, sugar can really interfere with the body's natural cues, so giving up sweets is a must for me. Nothing sweet for 30 days is my goal (including fruit, raw honey, dark chocolate and stevia!). This will also be covered in a full post soon.
    • Learn to love my body. There is no way I am going to live a nourished life if I'm not 100% comfortable in my own skin. My body image has improved dramatically during the last year, but there's still plenty of room for improvement. Again, this topic could probably span a whole post, so I'll talk about this more in the near future.

    Learn More...

    If you want to find out more about RRARF, you can read Matt's free e-book that explains the whole concept. You should also check out this interesting video presentation by Matt Stone. It will seriously change the way you think about food, dieting and your body.


    Other RRARF Posts:

    Day 1 on RRARF: What is RRARF?
    Day 2 on RRARF: Why I'm Doing It
    Day 3 on RRARF: Rest and Relaxation  
    Day 7 on RRARF: Benefits Already!
    Day 8 on RRARF: Eat the Food!
    Day 9 on RRARF: Adieu, Le Sucre!  
    Day 21 on RRARF: Deprivation is Dieting
    Day 23 on RRARF: Life Without the Scale

    RRARF vs. The Milk Diet







    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest

    30 Days of RRARF, Day 1: What is RRARF?



    Diet experiments are fun. And if not fun, at least they could be called interesting. RRARF is definitely going to be interesting.

    What is RRARF?

    Contrary to how it may sound, RRARF has nothing to do with dog chow or bulimia. RRARF actually stands for: Rehabilitative Rest & Aggressive Re-Feeding. This therapeutic diet was engineered by Matt Stone, who describes the diet in his free e-book:

    "Most people crave refined sugars, sweets, junk food, rapidly-absorbed white flour products, caffeine, alcohol, and other drugs because they are tragically undernourished and their adrenal glands have been overtaxed by everything from dieting to working too much to experiencing some major emotional trauma. RRARF attempts to combat all of this in one fell swoop (the saying ‘fell swoop’ makes no sense, but hopefully you know what it means)."

    Why RRARF?

    I've been following Matt's research into restoring metabolic health for some time, and while I've supported many of his general recommendations, I've never actually done the full RRARF program. From my own research into the work of Diana Schwarzbein, Julia Ross, Jon Gabriel, Linda Bacon and others, I know that metabolic recovery is an essential part of the healing process. But I told myself I didn't need to do RRARF all the way because I've been working on healing my metabolism for about two years now with great success.

    But... I've had some personal breakthroughs lately that gave me some insight into a few areas that I really need to work on. For one thing, I want to kiss diets and counting calories (or anything else) good-bye forever. I'd rather work with my body to the point where I can rely on my own internal signals for eating. I genuinely feel that if I can get my body to regulate my appetite, then that will pave the way for natural regulation of other things like hormones and body fat levels.

    And after listening to Matt's audio seminar sessions on lowering the weight set point and on addictive eating, I realized that I need to give sugar the boot, too. Not only because this seems to be the in vogue thing to do (have you read about Coconut Mama's 21 day sugar detox?), but because I'm thinking this may be the main culprit interfering with my body's natural regulation systems. (I'll go into much more detail on giving up sugar--and even all things sweet--in an upcoming post.)

    Make no mistake: RRARF is not a weight loss diet. As I said, I'm kissing those good-bye. Matt explains the point of RRARF like this:

    "To be clear, RRARF – Rehabilitative Rest & Aggressive Re-Feeding, is a plan designed to achieve one primary goal above all others – raise that mitochondrial activity. It does this through a combination of lowering cortisol levels, restoring the health of the adrenal glands, raising the hormone leptin, increasing leptin sensitivity, topping off nutritional reserves, and flooding the body with a surplus of energy – long known to raise body temperature, increase metabolic rate, increase lipolysis (using fat as fuel), etc."

    How to RRARF

    Here's a brief summary of how Matt suggests doing RRARF:

    1. Take a month off from exercise.
    2. Eat as much food as you can within 30 minutes of waking.
    3. As soon as you feel inclined to eat--eat again!
    4. Get extra sleep.
    5. Stay well-hydrated.
    6. Minimize mental and emotional strain, within reason.

    And although prejudiced individuals may have you believing Matt's plan involves binging on Krispy Cremes and Gatorade, this is not at all the case. In fact, Matt lays out some pretty strong guidelines for what the ideal foods for RRARF should be (although he stresses not to get neurotic about food):

    1. Rich in saturated fat, particularly short and medium chain saturated fatty acids (like butter and coconut oil).
    2. Rich in unrefined starch.
    3. High in calories.
    4. Low in fructose.
    5. Low in polyunsaturated fat.
    6. Devoid of refined carbs, junk food, processed food, fast food, etc.
    7. Devoid of caffeine, alcohol, nicotine and other drugs as much as possible.
    8. High in protein (but not too high).
    9. High in vegetables.

    These are the basics of RRARF, but I will be delving into much more detail about the meaning behind these recommendations over the next 30 days. I'll also dish about how I'm doing following the different parts of the plan. Some of these points are surprisingly easy for me to follow... others are going to be far more challenging!

    If you want to find out more about RRARF, check out Matt's free e-book here. For more about the perils of dieting and how to restore metabolic health, check out this revealing video presentation by Matt.

    Any questions? Ask away below in the comments!

    Other RRARF Posts:

    Day 1 on RRARF: What is RRARF?
    Day 2 on RRARF: Why I'm Doing It
    Day 3 on RRARF: Rest and Relaxation  
    Day 7 on RRARF: Benefits Already!
    Day 8 on RRARF: Eat the Food!
    Day 9 on RRARF: Adieu, Le Sucre!  
    Day 21 on RRARF: Deprivation is Dieting 
    Day 23 on RRARF: Life Without the Scale

    RRARF vs. The Milk Diet

    This post is part of Real Food Wednesday at Kelly the Kitchen Kop's blog.








    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest

    Podcast with Matt Stone: The Body Weight Set Point and Metabolism

    Yesterday I had the opportunity to interview one of my favorite bloggers and health researchers, Matt Stone from 180 Degree Health, about the body weight set point. After listening to his new audio seminar, I knew this was something people needed to hear about.

    What Matt and I discuss in this podcast goes against everything we're told about diet, weight and exercise. And yet I know anyone who's ever been on a diet is going to be nodding their head when they hear what Matt has to say.

    • Ever feel like your body is fighting against fat loss?
    • Wonder why it's so hard to stick to a diet?
    • Does restrictive dieting lead you to cravings and binging on "bad" foods?
    • Are you cold, tired or irritable when you're trying to lose weight?
    • Are you "check" dieting?

    Learn why Matt (and many other leading researchers) believe the focus should be on the weight set point, and not on weight. I personally believe this could be secret to finding a healthy, permanent weight without being chained to a life of deprivation and misery.

    Listen to the podcast now to learn about the body weight set point and metabolism:





    Listen to internet radio with The Nourished Life on Blog Talk Radio



    You can also click here if you want to listen to an additional in-depth presentation from Matt about the weight set point, dieting, metabolism and health, or to find out more about his free e-book or the new audio seminar. You might also want to check out his blog to hear the latest on achieving true metabolic health.










    This post is a part of Fight Back Friday hosted by Food Renegade.


    -----------------------------------
    Follow Me on Pinterest